Wednesday, January 30, 2008

PROGRESS: REVITEERS VS. SKETCHUPTEERS?

So, here are a few images of where I am right now, I decided to take a stab at Sketchup over the weekend and thanks to our good friend and teacher Mr. Anderle there is success. These are my first images on Sketchup ever! Thanks again Matt.
The first collection of images reflect the current progress of site design, as oppose to sketching all over, I am pursuing an approach where I am addressing each element individually. This requires a continuous check to what is being done previously. First task being treated is the corner, in this case the tower and the entry to the project. The images after the site plans reflect my study of the skin of the building. There will edits to the skin as it reaches the ground and the top, as you could see the top or bottom are not finished. For now, the outer skin is being considered as Glass panels where some of them fold and open to ventilate, where the lower panel opens to create a draft that exhales hot air at the top opening. This creates an interesting rhythm on the facade.



View West from Berkeley's Corner

View from the corner of Newbury and Mass. Ave

From the Super Highway just before entering the underpass.

SKINDEEP

The lower panels open to create a draft releasing hot air at the upper openings

SKIN VIEW

Future Classroom level (to be furnished)

View from above of the upper level

Section through the catwalk between the outer skin and the interior glazing

Section through middle of tower

Section through elevator shaft, this reflects the glazing wall allowing views from the elevator cab

Saturday, January 26, 2008

CRAZYNESS OR BRAVURA!

Dear Fellows,

I need your help!! I am about to cross the railroad tracks and I am not sure whether I should be enjoying this as much as I am, or whether I should stay the course. If I may be honest, I started this exercise as what not to do because I felt the challenge is not about solving the Urban edge, but about building a program at a specific site and dealing with the constraints. However, I started to examine the potential location of things, the edges, the resolutions and the character that each element takes once the project hovers over the Super Highway. I incorporated three quick snapshots I took before completing the intensive so that I could do this study. Click on every image to enlarge, there are comments to each arrow as you could see.





So, I think this scheme would totally need approval and recommendations from our Director of Zoning because the variance just went South! I am posting these images so that you guys let me know if I should pursue this further with a quick mass model in SKETCHUP. My feeling is that the Architecture could remain the same, but urbanistically the project takes on a completely different role. I think it becomes more machine like if a pursue it this way, and what I mean by machine is not "Deconstruction" or "Infrastructure", perhaps more "Emerging Technology" - Bourne Ultimatum/Bond. There are implications with how the Commuter rail affects the joining volumes, they certainly will get dismembered at the edge. If you could, since I must keep going I welcome comments about the plans, Architecture, etc... I anxiously await for your comments.


Monday, January 21, 2008

MIDTERM REVIEW - PRESENTATION

PRESENTATION:

My conceptual idea for the Distance student center is for a building center to address multiple challenges.  First and foremost I developed my parti to address the site urbanistically, as a response to the existing fabric, pedestrian, vehicular circulation and to establish itself at the corner as a landmark and a beacon.

The beacon is defined as a tower that houses curricular activities such as Classrooms, Digital laboratories, Faculty offices, Dining and Security facilities.  The opportunity that the tower creates urbanistically is an element that anchors the corner, it establishes a language in the skyline that visually communicates with the neighboring BAC facilities, therefore assisting in establishing an urban campus.

My hope is that The BAC will continue to occupy neighboring buildings and establish itself within the immediate City fabric.  Furthermore, the tower as a beacon serves as a recognizable element as you enter and exit the City via the Super highway.  The opportunity the tower creates for the Architectural students and Faculty is that it provides multiple vanishing points. 

The multiple levels to be occupied create a perfect living lab for the inhabitants to experience the City fabric, it provides a sort of step back view to see the realm from a different perspective, to invite the upcoming Architect to think differently, by occupying spaces differently, from the way you sleep to the way you create.

By the same token, the city fabric could see how Architecture is born, what is it that takes place during the schooling years of an Architect and what they go through in order to develop Architecture.  This will be studied with the transparency of the double skin or by perhaps creating ruptures in the skin to reveal the spaces inside.

The living quarters are placed as suspended pods or lanterns that house the sleeping alcoves as suites distributed in groups of six.  Bathing facilities are grouped to economize on materials, energy and water conservation.  The individual pods incorporate skylights and floor windows to expose the occupant to experiences of heaven and earth.  The living pods are entered at the third level of the tower where the dining and kitchen areas of the tower occur.

The strategy of joining the living quarters with the dining area at the third level of the tower is to establish a common level where students and faculty interact more casually, therefore creating a closer experience between student and mentor.  By eliminating the hierarchy between mentor and mentoree a more harmonial environment is created, in my opinion this is something that is already practiced at the BAC.

The supporting structure for the living quarters serve a dual purpose; Structural support and  a platform to house a wind turbine farm for the creation of renewable energy.

The third element is a bar building that defines an edge between the Super Highway, railroad tracks and the site.  The occupancy of the bar building is strictly restricted to car-lifting machines that house and retrieve automobiles at the command of a remote parking attendant. The bar building will rise approximately six levels, where only the first two lower levels will house the Mechanical utilities for the project.

There are Green Design strategies embedded in the project where the most noticeable and yet casually occupied is the Maximized open space.  The strategy of elevating the living quarters, a tower and mechanical parking allow for the project to have minimum footprint and as an outcome provide green areas and water retention ponds that are aesthetically pleasing and inviting to the neighborhood.  The implementation of water and landscape areas are opportunities to enrich living quality.

CRITIQUE:

The project was well received and now I need to work for the next few weeks with different media that will allow the project to further develop and better communicate the intent. Eric Nelson suggested to study the possibility of the project seating above the Super Highway, I intend to develop a quick study showing Why or Why not the project should do this.

I think the project will greatly benefit from having a three dimensional digital model that could quickly produce sections, elevations and perspectives of the interior spaces and exterior views. I enjoyed very much Mr. Lamb's comment on the project coming across as a machine, which I thought Eric's comment on the project leaving the Realm goes hand in hand with the latter.  I think that it accomplishes the intent I have for the project to challenge typologies and develop something new that will make upcoming Architects think differently and open up to new ideas. 

I envision this Architecture to touch on the contemplative and to start the fusion between Emerging Technologies with Green/Sustainable design strategies.


















MIDTERM REVIEW - MASS MODEL

AERIAL NORTHEAST VIEW
NORTHEAST VIEW FROM THE HIGHWAY
SOUTH VIEW ABOVE BOYLSTON STREET
AERIAL NORTHWEST VIEW

INTENSIVE - WORK IN PROGRESS

This is a diagram I put together during the intensive to study the possible circulation and layout of the living quarters.  After carefully reviewing and discussing the diagram with the code consultant we decided it was best to locate the bedrooms as a composition of bedrooms within a suite.


This diagram is generated for the tower to decide on the location of means of egress, travel distances and dead ends.
This hand sketch reflects how I envision the living quarters or bedrooms, suspended elements from a super structure spanning over open space.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

NEW PROGRAM

I incorporated in this new post specifications of electronics and furniture by room occupancy.  I will continue to adjust the program as the design develops in the Intensive.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

PROGRAM VISION











Sunday, January 6, 2008

VISION FOR DISTANCE LEARNING


I have put together a quick collage of images and an introductory mission statement depicting my vision for a future learning building.  I am moving on to sketches of the spaces so the representation of the project enters an Architectural language.  I will hold square footage calculations of green spaces until we are given a specific site, that way I could see what are the zoning requirements vs. Green opportunities and strategies.

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Greetings Everyone!

Happy New Year! I hope everyone is as excited as I am and looking forward to the course and the intensive. I started to organize my thoughts and things we need to prepare for the upcoming intensive in Boston, but I do have to confess that it's crazy but cool. If I remember correctly my affinity group was Kara, Amr and our friend Rick [no longer online :-( ]. I have not seen Amr online yet, anyone knows if he is around?